Winter 2010
Winter 2010 Management News
-
FEATURE ARTICLE: When Employees Are Off the Clock, It Does Not Mean Employers Are Always Off the Hook (Rutti v. Lojack)
-
BRIEF: Policy Requiring Advance Notice of Absences May Discriminate Against Disabled Employees, California Supreme Court Finds (Roby v. McKesson)
-
BRIEF: $200k Jury Verdict Affirmed After Employer Refused Restroom Break (A.M. v. Albertsons)
-
BRIEF: California Supreme Court Allows Trial Court Discretion in Denying Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Fees Under FEHA (Chavez v. City of Los Angeles)
-
BRIEF: Court Reverses Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Pregnancy Discrimination Suit Citing Failure to Give “Mixed-Motive” Jury Instruction (Harris v. City of Santa Monica)
-
BRIEF: Employer May Offer Lower Base Salary to Employees on 12-Hour Shift to Maintain Comparable Wages with Employees on 8-Hour Shift (Parth v. Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center)
-
BRIEF: Employee Privacy Rights at the Forefront of Employment Case Law from 2009 (Hillsides v. Hernandez; Pietrylo v. Hillstone Rest. Group)